Mint Explainer | Why oil prices remain on the boil despite a ceasefire

April 19, 2026 · 3:00 pm IST Source: LiveMint
๐Ÿ“Œ

Key Takeaways

  • In turn, Tehran is pushing for the unfreezing of more than $100 billion of its assets held overseas and a complete removal of economic sanctions imposed by the US and its allies.
  • For instance, benchmark Brent crude, which traded at about $74 a barrel before the US-Israeli strikes on Iran in late February, rose to a high of $107 when Iran effectively shut the Strait of Hormuz and key oil infrastructure in the region came under attack.
  • Though prices have stayed below $100 a barrel since the ceasefire announcement, conflicting signals from the US and Iran are keeping markets volatile.
  • After surging to over $110 a barrel at the peak of the conflict, oil prices moderated following the ceasefire announcement.

Full Report

This is a Mint Premium article gifted to you.Subscribe to enjoy similar stories.

Hostilities in West Asia may have eased, but oil prices remain well above pre-war levels. Though prices have stayed below $100 a barrel since the ceasefire announcement, conflicting signals from the US and Iran are keeping markets volatile.

Mint looks at the near-term outlook.

Yes. After surging to over $110 a barrel at the peak of the conflict, oil prices moderated following the ceasefire announcement. However, they remain above pre-war levels of around $65 a barrel.

For instance, benchmark Brent crude, which traded at about $74 a barrel before the US-Israeli strikes on Iran in late February, rose to a high of $107 when Iran effectively shut the Strait of Hormuz and key oil infrastructure in the region came under attack. Prices eased after the ceasefire, and on Friday Brent traded at $87 a barrel after Iran indicated that the strait had reopened.

On Saturday, Iran once again shut the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for about 15% of global oil trade, after objecting to continued US restrictions on vessels linked to its ports. According to news reports, a couple of ships were attacked over the weekend, further escalating tensions. Vessel movement has come to a near halt, and oil prices are therefore expected to rise when markets reopen on Monday.

While both sides have publicly claimed progress in talks, experts caution that a final deal remains distant, with the ceasefire set to end on Wednesday.

The US has demanded that Iran hand over its stockpile of enriched uranium and halt all enrichment activities within its territory for an extended period. It is also seeking firm assurances that Iran will not shut the Strait of Hormuz again in the future. Iran has rejected these demands.

In turn, Tehran is pushing for the unfreezing of more than $100 billion of its assets held overseas and a complete removal of economic sanctions imposed by the US and its allies.

There are several reasons. First, the gap between the two sides suggests that a comprehensive peace deal is unlikely anytime soon. Second, uncertainty over whether the ceasefire will hold or hostilities could resume continues to weigh on market sentiment. Third, the Strait of Hormuz must remain open consistently for shipments to resume at scale.

Experts say that it could take weeks to clear accumulated inventories and move stored oil. Only after that can shut-in oil wells be brought back online, a process that takes time. Damaged oil infrastructure will also need repairs before production can return to pre-war levels.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned that the West Asia conflict is driving up energy and food prices across the world, adding to inflationary pressures and weighing on economic growth. It has also warned that the conflict risks pushing up government borrowings, which as a share of gross domestic product is set to touch 100% by 2029, a level not seen since the second world war.

For India, prolonged disruption could translate into slower growth if high energy prices persist.

N Madhavan has been writing on business and economy for more than 30 years now. A Chevening Scholar, he loves longform writing and has had the privilege of honing his skills at The Economist as an intern in the past. He writes across various sectors, with a primary focus on macro-economy, business groups in southern India, and corporate stories. He has worked in newspapers as well as magazines, with bylines in The Financial Express, Business Today, Forbes India and The Hindu BusinessLine. This is his fourth year at Mint where he presently curates the explanatory Primer section and also writes Long Stories. Based in Chennai, he is the winner of the Shriram-Sanlam Award for Business Journalism. He loves ground reporting, including travelling in a truck twice between Chennai and Mumbai, to bring life to the stories he works on. He was once almost lynched while reporting on onion prices at Lasalgaon in Maharashtra, a fact he captured in the story he eventually wrote for Business Today. Apart from writing, he loves reading, listening to music (Ilayaraja is his favourite composer) and travelling.

Originally reported by LiveMint.
๐Ÿ’ก

IPO Cracker Take

Monetary policy shifts ripple into IPO valuations through discount rates and liquidity. Use our IPO evaluation framework to factor rate changes into any upcoming issue.

โ“

Frequently Asked Questions

Higher rates increase the discount rate used in DCF valuations, typically compressing IPO valuations. Banking and NBFC IPOs benefit from rate cycles in different ways than tech or consumer.

Broader rate outlook matters, but each IPO should still be evaluated on its own financials. Our IPO evaluation framework walks through the key metrics.

Banking, NBFC, housing finance, and real estate are the most rate-sensitive. Consumer staples and utilities are relatively insulated.
0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your opinion!