Compare IPOs Side by Side
Select 2 or 3 IPOs to compare their GMP, subscription status, financials, and more.
| Parameter | Amba Auto Sales | Value 360 Communications |
|---|---|---|
| Price Band | ₹130 - ₹135 | ₹95 - ₹98 |
| Lot Size | 2,000 | 2,400 |
| Min Investment | ₹2,70,000 | ₹2,35,200 |
| Issue Size | ₹65.00 Cr | ₹42,54,000.00 Cr |
| GMP | +₹0 | — |
| GMP % | +0.0% | — |
| Expected Listing | ₹135 | — |
| Subscription | 1.18x | — |
| QIB | 1.75x | — |
| NII / HNI | 1.57x | — |
| Retail | 0.70x | — |
| Financials | ||
| Revenue Growth | 14.7% | 7.8% |
| Profit Margin | 3.2% | 10.6% |
| P/E Ratio | — | — |
| ROE | 69.1% | 18.1% |
| Debt/Equity | 3.65 | 0.36 |
| Recommendation | Avoid | Subscribe |
| Key Dates | ||
| Open Date | Apr 27, 2026 | May 04, 2026 |
| Close Date | Apr 29, 2026 | May 06, 2026 |
| Listing Date | May 05, 2026 | — |
How to Compare IPOs Effectively
Comparing IPOs side by side is one of the most useful exercises before applying — it forces you to look at relative valuations, growth trajectories, and demand signals rather than each issue in isolation. Use this tool to compare 2 or 3 IPOs at once across the metrics that actually move listing-day outcomes.
Which Metrics Matter Most
Not all comparison metrics are equally informative. Here's what to focus on:
- P/E Ratio (post-issue) vs Industry P/E — the single most useful valuation check. An IPO priced significantly above industry peers needs to justify the premium with faster growth or better margins.
- Subscription multiple, especially QIB — institutional uptake is the strongest signal of issue quality. Compare QIB participation across IPOs to spot the one with stronger institutional interest.
- GMP as % of issue price — absolute GMP can mislead because issue prices differ. A Rs 50 GMP on a Rs 200 issue (25%) is more bullish than Rs 80 on a Rs 800 issue (10%).
- Revenue growth and profit margin trends — fundamentals matter more than people think on listing day. Companies showing 25%+ revenue growth tend to outperform stagnant ones.
- Issue size and OFS proportion — smaller issues with high fresh-capital component (low OFS) are usually more positively received than large OFS-heavy issues where promoters are exiting.
When Side-by-Side Comparison Helps Most
Comparison is especially valuable when you have limited capital and need to choose between two open IPOs, when you want to benchmark a current IPO against a recently listed peer in the same sector, or when you're comparing SME and Mainboard issues in your portfolio allocation. It is less useful for fundamentally different sectors (e.g., a tech SaaS issue vs a manufacturing issue) where direct metric comparison can mislead — there, sector context matters more.
Reading the Comparison Carefully
Don't pick the "winner" based on a single metric. An IPO with the highest GMP might be aggressively priced, while the one with lower GMP might have stronger fundamentals and better long-term potential. Look for IPOs that score reasonably well across multiple dimensions — valuation, fundamentals, demand, anchor quality — rather than one that maxes out a single metric. The recommendation badge on each IPO's detail page already factors all of these together; use the comparison to validate or challenge that conclusion.
For deeper context on any individual metric, click through to each IPO's detail page from the comparison table. None of this is investment advice — always read the RHP and consult a SEBI-registered advisor before applying.
Explore More
Quick links to all IPO sections